Last week someone mentioned that women's sanitary hygiene products are taxed as a luxury item.
I laughed at what absurdity the statement was...then I researched it.
OMG!
The UK defines tampons as "non-essential luxury items" and are taxed an extra 5%.
Australia taxes women's hygiene products by 10%, again, because they are "non-essential".
In the States there is a luxury tax on products that are not considered to be essential which the lawmakers say affects the wealthy as the products taxed are fur coats, expensive automobiles, jewelry and, oh yeah, tampons. The government actually collects over 19 million dollars a year on tampon taxes.
As long as I was researching genitalia related items, I checked out jock straps and protective cups. Now these two items are not used for everyday life but for sports and to protect the almighty male package. There is no jock strap tax.
I checked out electric shavers. Men have facial hair. Shaving it is a choice. Using a razor or an electric shaver is a choice. Why are electric shavers not taxed as a luxury item?
In 2008 the state of New York was considering adding an extra 5% luxury tax on jewelry and furs that cost more than $20,000 and fun stuff like airplanes or helicopters that cost more than $500,000, yachts that cost more than $200,000. The rich dodged a bullet on that one because the proposal was struck down.
There are even states that grant 'tax holidays' (Alabama, for example). On the holiday, say, July 4th, no taxes will have to be paid that day, except for tampons, they are still taxed.
I propose that all menstruating women visit your state capitol tampon free. Wear a dress or skirt and lift them as you sit on the benches (make sure to bring some sanitizing wipes, not sure if they are taxed or not). Attend legislature assemblies, again, wipe the seat with a sanitizing wipe, lift your skirt and leave a little non-essential luxury on the seats. Same for buses, trains and planes.
Sorry ladies, this is one of those biases we are going to have to take 'sitting down'!
I laughed at what absurdity the statement was...then I researched it.
OMG!
The UK defines tampons as "non-essential luxury items" and are taxed an extra 5%.
Australia taxes women's hygiene products by 10%, again, because they are "non-essential".
In the States there is a luxury tax on products that are not considered to be essential which the lawmakers say affects the wealthy as the products taxed are fur coats, expensive automobiles, jewelry and, oh yeah, tampons. The government actually collects over 19 million dollars a year on tampon taxes.
As long as I was researching genitalia related items, I checked out jock straps and protective cups. Now these two items are not used for everyday life but for sports and to protect the almighty male package. There is no jock strap tax.
I checked out electric shavers. Men have facial hair. Shaving it is a choice. Using a razor or an electric shaver is a choice. Why are electric shavers not taxed as a luxury item?
In 2008 the state of New York was considering adding an extra 5% luxury tax on jewelry and furs that cost more than $20,000 and fun stuff like airplanes or helicopters that cost more than $500,000, yachts that cost more than $200,000. The rich dodged a bullet on that one because the proposal was struck down.
There are even states that grant 'tax holidays' (Alabama, for example). On the holiday, say, July 4th, no taxes will have to be paid that day, except for tampons, they are still taxed.
I propose that all menstruating women visit your state capitol tampon free. Wear a dress or skirt and lift them as you sit on the benches (make sure to bring some sanitizing wipes, not sure if they are taxed or not). Attend legislature assemblies, again, wipe the seat with a sanitizing wipe, lift your skirt and leave a little non-essential luxury on the seats. Same for buses, trains and planes.
Sorry ladies, this is one of those biases we are going to have to take 'sitting down'!